Project Overview

 

Home

Project Overview

Project Documents

Contact Information

 

 

Summary Back to Top

 

In the United States, Texas has suffered more than twice the number of flash flood fatalities than the second-ranking state.  A major contributor to Texas’ dubious ranking is the fact that it is home to one of the largest road systems in the nation, with numerous Low Water Crossings (LWCs) responsible for the majority of flash flood fatalities.  The implementation of a statewide GIS for LWCs and Swift Water Rescues (SWRs) to identify high risk areas will provide the International  Flash Flood Laboratory (IFFL), the Texas Flash Flood Coalition (TFFC), the Texas Department of Health Services and other Texas agencies with a better understanding of the relationship between the number and locations of these sites and present spatial resources that can be used to prevent future deaths and injuries related to flash floods.

 

 

Purpose Back to Top

 

Currently, no known database exists containing LWCs in Texas, and the SWR records are little more than lists of incidences.  Elite Water Rescue Prevention Consultants (EWRP Consultants) has created a GIS containing both documented and potential LWC sites as well as SWRs reported in 2007.  While it has been an exercise in patience as information was converted from raw information into spatial data, the foundation EWRP Consultants has built is essential for achieving a way to answer the questions surrounding the fact of Texas’ anomalously high number of flood-related fatalities. Now that these elements are in the GIS, spatial and temporal correlations can be made and more complex analysis can be done to build upon this foundation by further elucidating connections and clarifying spatial relationships needed by the IFFL and the TFFC.

 

 

Scope Back to Top

 

The SWR data that the EWRP Consultants used to create the GIS is from 2007.  The TFFC shared research by Hatim Sharif which classifies Texas counties by aggregate number of flash flood-related fatalities, shown in Figures 1-3.  EWRP Consultants entered SWR and LWC data for the forty-four counties within the proposed Flash Flood Alley, regardless of designation by fatality, shown in Figure 4.  The LWC analysis covers all the counties in the proposed Flash Flood Alley for which FEMA floodplains are available

 

bluecountiesgreencountiesredcounties

 

 

 

Data Back to Top

Swift Water Rescue

The data utilized during the course of this project was collected from a variety of sources.  The primary Excel spreadsheet, which listed all of the Swift Water Rescues, was obtained from the FEMA’s National Fire Incident Reporting System.  Much of the data that needed to be used for locating SWRs on the map was available for each individual county and came from Texas Natural Resource Information System (TNRIS), including Texas transportation networks, FEMA floodplains and Strat Map Contours.  Detailed hydrography data was available from Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). 

Low Water Crossings

EWRP Consultants successfully gathered data from four legal entities in Texas.  Hays County and Burleson Fire Department provided shapefiles for LWCs in those areas.  Marble Falls Fire Department sent a map and Killeen Fire Department sent a list showing LWCs for which EWRP Consultants used  the same process and tools described above for SWRs to create shapefiles.

 

    • SWR Excel Table:
      • State Fire Marshall’s Office
      • FEMA’s National Fire Incident Reporting System
    • Priority County Designations by Flash Flood-Related Fatalities:
      • Created by Hatim Sharif of UTSA, using:
        • National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Storm Data
        • Spatial Hazard Event and Loss Database (SHELDUS)
        • Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS)
    • LWC Data:
      • Shapefile of LWCs from Hays County
      • Shapefile of LWCs from Burleson Fire Department
      • Map and list of LWCs from Marble Falls Fire Department
      • List of LWCs from Killeen Fire Department
    • Supporting Shapefiles:
      • TNRIS:
        • Transportation by county
        • Floodplains by county
        • Strat Map Contours by quadrangle
      • ESRI:
        • Hydrology for North America, clipped to Texas

Methodology Back to Top

 

EWRP Consultants split up 767 recorded SWRs from forty-four counties identified as the proposed Flash Flood Alley.  The goal was for each record in the excel table to become a point in the GIS based on the address and directions given in the reports written by fire departments that were used to create the table.  The base map used to place the points in the correct locations was made up of an ESRI hydrography layer, county TNRIS transportation layers, TNRIS Strat Map Contour lines and the Arc Server world road map.  Selecting the road name given in the excel description by attribute from the TNRIS transportation layer was adequate for many records, but most required reference to Yahoo maps and many had to be tried with alternate spelling.  Many numbered roads reported as “FM” or “Hwy” were eventually located using an entirely different prefix.  Some records were made easier to locate by the directions field from the excel table, which helped to zero in on the area of the SWR.  Once the target road had been identified, the next step was using reasonable judgment to place the SWR point at the most likely area of the road for the SWR to have occurred.  Using the ESRI hydrography and the TNRIS Strat Map Contour lines, EWRPC chose the segment of roads with the lowest elevation for the placement of the SWR points.  Unfortunately, insufficient information was provided for some records and these were marked as “Unable to Locate.” 

 

Results Back to Top

 

EWRPC has implemented a statewide GIS for SWRs and LWCs.  This new GIS will provide information to local governments and independent companies to help them better understand LWCs and how they interact with SWRs.  As part of the process, EWRP Consultants did research in order to elucidate the concept of a Flash Flood Alley.  In none of the literature were specific boundaries defined, so EWRP Consultants set the precedent by proposing a forty-four county area of Central Texas along the Balcones Escarpment.EWRP Consultants spent many hours analyzing the Swift Water Rescue street locations reported and determining the best position on the map to place these occurrences.  This took careful consideration of the spatial relationship between the roads, the elevation and the location of the nearest body of water.  As one would expect, the relationship remained consistent throughout the state, with the Swift Water Rescue occurring within a close proximity to the nearest river.  There were a small number of outliers: SWRs that seemed to have occurred in an area where there is no body of water within miles.  This is most likely due to the fact that drainage occurs in places other than established streambeds during short term high volume precipitation events.  It will also be helpful to the IFFL and the TFFC for future researchers to perform complex analysis and clarify spatial relationships.  EWRPC Consultants created a shapefile containing 675 of the 767 SWRs in the forty-four counties identified as the proposed Flash Flood Alley.  This is an 88% completion rate and provides the IFFL and the TFFC with tangible spatial data to work with in the future.  Maps showing the visual results of the work done by ERWP Consultants can be viewed in Appendix 3.  A KML file is available for viewing the SWR locations on the EWRP Consultants website.

 

Conclusion Back to Top

 

EWRP Consultants has established a GIS for LWCs and 2007 SWRs that is the foundation for the research and spatial analysis that the IFFL, the TFFC and other Texas agencies desire to carry out with the intention of reducing the number of flash flood-related injuries and deaths in the state of Texas.  Although time only allowed SWRs in the forty-four counties in the proposed Flash Flood Alley to be completed, the precedent has been set and the ball is in motion.  The procedure developed for mapping SWRs is an efficient and viable one, and EWRP Consultants recommend its use in the future to map SWRs reported in other years.  Targeting potential LWC areas by the intersection method using ArcGIS is a reasonable way to begin to represent these areas in a digital world, and there is room for future researchers to refine the model and eliminate false positives.  As this foundation grows and the database becomes more complete, a wealth of information is there for the taking using the powerful tool of GIS.